Wireless Network Coding Optimization

ABSTRACT

Network coding (NC) is an emerging technique of packet forwarding that encodes packets at relay node in order to increase network throughput. It is understood that the performance of NC is strongly dependent on the physical layer as well as the MAC layer, and greedy coding method may in fact reduce the network throughput owing to the reduction in the spatial reuse. In this paper, we propose a NC-aware scheduling method combining link aggregation to improve the network throughput by considering the interplay between NC and spatial reuse. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed link aggregation method compared with the unicast transmission model.

LIST OF ACRONYMS

  • EM – Electromagnetic
  • IM – Instant Messaging
  • LNC – Linear Network Coding
  • MAC – Media Access Control
  • NC – Network Coding
  • ONC – Opportunistic Network Coding
  • PNC – Physical Network Coding
  • RLNC – Random Linear Network Coding
  • SNR – Signal Noise Ratio
  • TNC – Triangular Network Coding
  • TWRC – Two-Way Relay Channel

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COVER PAGE

TITLE PAGE

APPROVAL PAGE

DEDICATION

ACKNOWELDGEMENT

ABSTRACT

LIST OF ACRONYMS

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

  • BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT
  • PROBLEM STATEMENT
  • AIM OF THE PROJECT
  • OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT
  • SCOPE OF THE PROJECT
  • PROJECT ORGANISATION

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

  • INTRODUCTION
  • DEFINITION OF NETWORK CODING
  • THEORY BEHIND NETWORK CODING
  • NETWORK CODING SCHEMES
  • RANDOM LINEAR NETWORK CODING
  • TRIANGULAR NETWORK CODING
  • OPPORTUNISTIC NETWORK CODING
  • PHYSICAL LAYER NETWORK CODING
  • THEORY BEHIND PNC
  • APPLICATIONS OF NC TO WIRELESS NETWORKS
  • NETWORK CODING IN COMMUNICATION
  • RELATED WORKS

CHAPTER THREE

  • METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER FOUR

  • RESULT

CHAPTER FIVE

  • CONCLUSION
  • REFERENCES

CHAPTER ONE

1.0                                                              INTRODUCTION

1.1                              BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

The notion of coding at the packet level—commonly called network coding—has attracted significant interest since the publication of [1], which showed the utility of network coding for multicast in packet networks.  But the utility of network coding reaches much further. And, in particular, it reaches to include various wireless applications. In fact, wireless packet networks are a most natural setting for network coding because the very characteristics of wireless links that complicate routing, namely, their unreliability and broadcast nature, are the very characteristics for which coding is a natural solution. Couple this with the fact that we are not nearly as constrained in our protocol design choices in the wireless case as we are in the  wireline one, and applying network coding  to wireless packet networks seems an ideal way of achieving appreciable efficiency gains.

Overlapped signals are always considered to be harmful in wireless communication systems. However, the emergence of network coding (NC) has shifted the design method of network communication. In conventional network coding (CNC) scheme, the relay node encodes packets after receiving them in separate communication phases. Physical layer network coding (PNC) was first proposed in 2006 and then received widely research. It encodes packets through simultaneous transmissions. It is a simple fact in physics that when multiple electromagnetism (EM) waves come together within the same physical space, they can add. The mixing of EM waves is a form of NC performed by nature. Although CNC and PNC schemes can convey the same number of packets with less transmission time, they may not always be the optimal transmission methods. One reason is that the relay node has to broadcast with higher transmission power to guarantee all the receiving nodes can receive the packet successfully in the broadcasting stage, which may decrease concurrent transmissions. Another reason is performing NC in a greedy method may lower the spectrum spatial reuse, and decline network throughput. Therefore, NC and scheduling for spatial reuse should be jointly considered for network design.

It has been demonstrated in [1] that the NC performance has a closely relationship with the joint decision between physical layer and MAC layer. Because greedy NC may decrease spatial reuse and lower network throughput, a trade-off should be conducted between spatial reuse and NC gain. Due to the time varying characteristics in wireless network, there may be a huge gap among different links, nodes should adopt scheduling scheme in order to optimize network performance. Since the applications (such as video gaming, video conferencing), whose content involves multicasting data to a set of receivers, increase sharply nowadays, handling multicast traffic is undoubtedly becoming of significant interest. In this paper, we study the interplay between scheduling and NC, and present a NC-aware link scheduling scheme to improve network throughput by adding virtual links for link aggregation in wireless network.

1.2                                    PROBLEM STATEMENT

In today’s wireless networks, diversity is regarded as an efficient and established means to combat multipath fading. Moreover, user cooperation has emerged lately as an elegant technique to achieve spatial diversity over wireless channels, where the installation of multiple antennas on handheld, battery-powered, mobile terminals is often impractical. Recently, the application of network coding in cooperative wireless networks has gained increasing interest with its potential to further boost the network performance, such as in terms of the achievable throughput. With network coding, the relaying nodes are allowed to linearly combine packets from multiple source nodes, and then forward the combined packets for better resource utilization. — We propose mutual user pairing in amulti-user infrastructure-based network-coded cooperative wireless network to realize network coding, in the absence of dedicated relay nodes. We propose an optimal user pairing algorithm, and tailor it to maximize the network capacity. Next, we develop heuristic pairing algorithms which approach the optimal performance at a reduced complexity. Performance analysis is conducted in terms of the average capacity per user, average outage probability per user, and user-fairness. — For energy-constrained network-coded cooperative networks, we subsequently address the problem of transmission power minimization. A joint optimization problem is formulated and solved to find the pairing which maximizes the network capacity, and minimizes the transmission power, such that certain performance constraints in terms of the average capacity per user or average outage probability per user are satisfied.

1.3                                      AIM OF THE PROJECT

The main aim of this work is to propose a joint NC-aware link scheduling method to optimize the throughput gain by considering the interplay between NC and spatial reuse with power control for unicast transmission.

1.4                                 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

At the end of this study, we shall overview some of the main features of network coding that are most relevant to wireless networks.  In particular, we discuss, first, the asymptotic optimality of random distributed network coding for wireless networks with and without packet erasures; and, second, the superior performance and relative ease of cost optimization in coded wireless networks as opposed to traditional routed wireless networks.

1.5                                      SCOPE OF THE STUDY

Based on an information model that classifies intermediate nodes in multicast networks into network coding, routing and replicating nodes, multicast max-flow and minimum cost optimization frameworks are formulated to solve optimization problems in wireless networks with or without network coding. Two special properties of wireless transmissions are taken into consideration, i.e., multi-hop cooperation and mutual interference among nodes. Such expressions are then used to modify the edge capacity in the optimization frameworks. The proposed method is helpful to the study of node cooperation and competition in multi-hop wireless communication networks.

1.6                                   PROJECT ORGANISATION

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews some related works, and the optimal NC-aware link scheduling scheme is presented in Section 3. Simulation results are illustrated in Section 4, and some concluding remarks are provided in Section 5.

 

APA

Wireless Network Coding Optimization. (n.d.). UniTopics. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/wireless-network-coding-optimization/

MLA

“Wireless Network Coding Optimization.” UniTopics, https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/wireless-network-coding-optimization/. Accessed 20 September 2024.

Chicago

“Wireless Network Coding Optimization.” UniTopics, Accessed September 20, 2024. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/wireless-network-coding-optimization/

WORK DETAILS

Here’s a typical structure for Wireless Network Coding Optimization research projects:

  • The title page of Wireless Network Coding Optimization should include the project title, your name, institution, and date.
  • The abstract of Wireless Network Coding Optimization should be a summary of around 150-250 words and should highlight the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
  • The introduction of Wireless Network Coding Optimization should provide the background information, outline the research problem, and state the objectives and significance of the study.
  • Review existing research related to Wireless Network Coding Optimization, identifying gaps the study aims to fill.
  • The methodology section of Wireless Network Coding Optimization should describe the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques used.
  • Present the findings of the Wireless Network Coding Optimization research study using tables, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points.
  • Interpret Wireless Network Coding Optimization results, discussing their implications, limitations, and potential areas for future research.
  • Summarize the main findings of the Wireless Network Coding Optimization study and restate its significance.
  • List all the sources you cited in Wireless Network Coding Optimization project, following a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).
WORK DETAILS