Viewership Of Television Programmers

A Case Study Of Enugu South Local Government
ABSTRACT

This research work was carried out in order to find out what the populace of Enugu south thinks or feels about television programme in Enugu state. The research also attempted to look into people work related to the research topic.
During research, the people of Enugu south were used as the populace of study, questionnaires were the major instrument of study. Random sampling method was applied to obtain the potion of the population on whom the instruments were administered.
Responses were analyzed on percentage. For the more, the significant problem and question for this research were spelt out in order to help, uphold or reject certain assumption. The data collected from the questionnaires made it possible for the researcher to get the answer agitating his mind. It was noted that on human behavior.
The study was able to find out actually what the populace of Enugu south think or feel about the positive or negative effect toward television programmers in Enugu state.
The research also made recommendation on what should be done to make our television content more result oriented and interesting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page
Approval Page
Dedication
Acknowledgment
Abstract
Table Of Contents

Chapter One
1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background Of The Study
1.2 Statement Of Research Problem
1.3 Objective Of The Study
1.4 Significance Of The Study
1.5 Research Questions
1.6 Hypothesis
1.7 Assumptions
1.8 Definition Of Terms
1.9 Scope And Limitation Of The Study Reference.

Chapter Two
2.0 Literature Review

2.1 Source Of Literature Review
2.2 Literature Review
2.3 Theoretical Frame Work
2.4 Summary Of Literature Review

Chapter Three
3.0 Research Methodology

3.1 Research Method & Design
3.2 Population Of Study
3.3 Sample Size
3.4 Method Of Data Collection
3.5 Procedure For Data Analysis
3.6 Measuring Used To Ensure Validity & Reliability
3.7 Instrument For Gathering Data.

Chapter Four
4.0 Data Presentation And Analysis

4.1 Data Analysis
4.2 Result
4.3 Discussion Of The Finding

Chapter Five
5.0 Summary

5.1 Recommendation
5.2 Conclusion
References
Appendix

APA

Viewership Of Television Programmers. (n.d.). UniTopics. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/viewership-of-television-programmers/

MLA

“Viewership Of Television Programmers.” UniTopics, https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/viewership-of-television-programmers/. Accessed 22 November 2024.

Chicago

“Viewership Of Television Programmers.” UniTopics, Accessed November 22, 2024. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/viewership-of-television-programmers/

WORK DETAILS

Chapters:
5
Pages:
51
Words:
6461

Here’s a typical structure for Viewership Of Television Programmers research projects:

  • The title page of Viewership Of Television Programmers should include the project title, your name, institution, and date.
  • The abstract of Viewership Of Television Programmers should be a summary of around 150-250 words and should highlight the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
  • The introduction of Viewership Of Television Programmers should provide the background information, outline the research problem, and state the objectives and significance of the study.
  • Review existing research related to Viewership Of Television Programmers, identifying gaps the study aims to fill.
  • The methodology section of Viewership Of Television Programmers should describe the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques used.
  • Present the findings of the Viewership Of Television Programmers research study using tables, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points.
  • Interpret Viewership Of Television Programmers results, discussing their implications, limitations, and potential areas for future research.
  • Summarize the main findings of the Viewership Of Television Programmers study and restate its significance.
  • List all the sources you cited in Viewership Of Television Programmers project, following a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).