This research investigated how the sweetness of sugar substitute compares to
the sweetness of sugar. In this research different percentage solution of sugar,
artificial sweetener and natural sweetener (10%, 1%, 0.1% and 0.01%) were
prepared. Ten volunteers were gathered for the sensory evaluation in this
case tasting of the solution, the volunteer‟s taste threshold of data was gotten.
The artificial sweetener was found out to be the sweetest among the
substances experimented and at the percentage of 0.1% and 0.01% saccharin
an artificial sweetener was able to mimic the taste of sugar. Research prove
that artificial sweetener are non-nutritive they have virtually no calories in
contrast to sugar which contains 4 calories at each gram, a teaspoon of sugar
is about 4 grams, for weight lose artificial sweetener may be an attractive
option to sugar. Artificial sweetener may also be a good alternative for
diabetic patient, unlike sugar; artificial sweeteners generally don‟t raise
blood sugar levels because they are not carbohydrates
Title page
Certification
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table of contents
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
1.1Research aim and objectives
1.2 Significance of study
CHAPTER TWO
Review of literature
2.0 Table sugar (sucrose)
2.1Classification of sugar
2.1.1Mechanism of action in the body
2.1.2 Sugar alcohols and novel sweeteners
2.1.3 Advantages and disadvantages of sugar0
2.2 Artificial sweetener
2.2.1 Advantages and disadvantages of artificial sweetener
2.2.2 Reasons for use
2.2.3 Differences btw sugar and artificial sweetener
2.2.4 Biochemical reaction of artificial sweetener
2.3 Aspartame
2.4 Sucralose
2.5 Saccharin
2.6 Stevia
2.7 Erythrit1
2.8 Honey
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Materials and methods
3.1 Equipment/apparatus used
3.2 Methodology
3.3 Testing the solutions
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Result
4.1 Volunteer‟s taste threshold data for sugar
4.2 Volunteer‟s taste threshold data for saccharin.
4.3 Volunteer‟s taste threshold data for honey
4.4Total number of people who detected a change in taste
4.5 Degree of sweetness34
CHAPTER FIVE
Discussion and conclusion
References
Appendix
List of tables
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
Table 4.3
Table 4.4
Table 4.5
Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar. (n.d.). UniTopics. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/determination-of-active-sweet-components-of-common-artificial-sweeteners-that-are-used-as-replacement-for-sugar/
“Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar.” UniTopics, https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/determination-of-active-sweet-components-of-common-artificial-sweeteners-that-are-used-as-replacement-for-sugar/. Accessed 22 November 2024.
“Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar.” UniTopics, Accessed November 22, 2024. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/determination-of-active-sweet-components-of-common-artificial-sweeteners-that-are-used-as-replacement-for-sugar/
Here’s a typical structure for Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar research projects:
- The title page of Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar should include the project title, your name, institution, and date.
- The abstract of Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar should be a summary of around 150-250 words and should highlight the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
- The introduction of Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar should provide the background information, outline the research problem, and state the objectives and significance of the study.
- Review existing research related to Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar, identifying gaps the study aims to fill.
- The methodology section of Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar should describe the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques used.
- Present the findings of the Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar research study using tables, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points.
- Interpret Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar results, discussing their implications, limitations, and potential areas for future research.
- Summarize the main findings of the Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar study and restate its significance.
- List all the sources you cited in Determination Of Active Sweets Components Of Common Artificial Sweeteners That Are Used As Replacement For Sugar project, following a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).