Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand

A Case Study Of Enugu South Local Government Area
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to draw a comparison of public and private schools students performance in shorthand in Enugu matroplist in Eight selected schools in Enugu Education zone, Enugu state, Nigeria, the following schools were studied.
Public schools
Idaw river girls secondary school, Enugu
Army day secondary schools Enugu
Girls high school, awkunanaw Enugu
Union secondary school, Awkunanaw Enugu
Private schools
Immaculate commercial college Enugu
Niger school of commerce Enugu
Queens comprehensive school Enugu
Salvation vocational college Enugu
The students of the two different schools were given a test on shorthand at it speed rate of 60 words per minute to determine their performances. In addition, teachers at the subject in the selected schools were interviewed on the factors responsible for either better or poor performance of students in the subject.
From the data collected, the researcher was able to assess the performance of both schools in the comparative study. These were treated in details in chapter four, but some of them are; that constant practicing, dedication to studying the subject and having interest on the subject enhances performance, while poor performance emanate as a result of lack of interest, irregular attendance to class etc.
Based in the data, it established that students in private schools are poor. Among the recommendations preferred shorthand theory should in incorporated in the production work from the beginning to the end of students graduation and adequate facilities be provided in relative to lecturers.
In addition, business English should be effectively integrated into the day to day teaching of shorthand.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover page
Title page
Certificate of approval page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
List of table
Table of content

CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
1.2 Statement of the problems
1.3 Objective of the study
1.4 Importance/significance of the study
1.5 Research questions
1.6 Scope/limitation of the study

CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 The use of shorthand in the dark ages
2.1.2. Early modern use of shorthand
2.1.3. Early use of American Colonies
2.1.4. European system of shorthand
2.2. Isaac Pitman’s shorthand system and invention
2.3. Machine shorthand and invention
2.4. Modern shorthand and requirement (Thomas Gurney system)
2.2.1 Uses and requirement of modern shorthand Pitman
2.2.2 Present modern uses of shorthand
2.2.3 Uses of shorthand in an office
2.3 The constrains of shorthand
2.3.1 Description of previous research works based on general constrains of shorthand performance
2.3.2 Mastery in the transcribing of shorthand
2.3.3 Acquisition of basic skill
2.3.4 Extensive and intensive reading
2.3.5 Effective communication skill
2.3.6 Intelligence
2.3.7 Aptitude development
2.3.8 Persistence
2.3.9 Poor educational foundations
2.3.10 Motivation
2.4 Private schools objectives and obstacles militating against it’s academic excellence in shorthand
2.4.1 Objectives
2.4.2 Public secondary schools
2.5 Process of achieving the aims of shorthand.
2.5.1 Wider aims
2.6 Method of teaching shorthand
2.8.1The need for intensive training
2.8.2. The first lesson
2.8.3. Word frequency
2.8.4. Teaching by induction and deduction
2.7 Procedure to enhancing programme of students in shorthand
2.7.1 The rational of shorthand
2.7.2 The importance of basic principles
2.7.3 Enhancing students performances in shorthand and by correlation within the commercial courses.
2.7.4 Correlation in shorthand
2.8 Teaching transcription
2.8.1 Stages in typed transcription
2.8.2 Styles writing
2.8.3 Repetition dictation
2.8.4 A more elaborated speed forcing technique speed up speed method
2.8.5 Condition determining transcription rate.
2.8.6 The use of sound tape
2.8.7 Audio class organization
2.8.8 Advantages of audio manual
2.11. Marketing student work
2.11.1Process records
2.11.2 Summary of literature

CHAPTER THREE
3.0 DESIGN/METHODOLOGY FOR THE STUDY
3.1 Research design
3.2 Area of study
3.3 Population of study
3.4 Instrument for data collection
3.5 Validation of research
3.6 Reliability of the study
3.7 Method of data collection
3.8 Administration of research
3.9 Methods of data analysis

CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 Presentation and analysis of data
4.2 Summary of results and findings

CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 DISCUSSION, IMPLICATION, RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Discussion of results
5.2 Conclusions
5.3 Implication of the results
5.4 Recommendations
5.4.1 Government
5.4.2 Institution
5.4.3 Lecturers
5.4.4 Students
5.5 Suggestion for further research
5.6 Limitation of the study
Bibliography
Appendices
Questionnaires

 

 

APA

Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand. (n.d.). UniTopics. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-study-of-public-and-private-schools-students-performance-in-shorthand/

MLA

“Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand.” UniTopics, https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-study-of-public-and-private-schools-students-performance-in-shorthand/. Accessed 22 November 2024.

Chicago

“Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand.” UniTopics, Accessed November 22, 2024. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-study-of-public-and-private-schools-students-performance-in-shorthand/

WORK DETAILS

Chapters:
5
Pages:
105
Words:
14565

Here’s a typical structure for Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand research projects:

  • The title page of Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand should include the project title, your name, institution, and date.
  • The abstract of Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand should be a summary of around 150-250 words and should highlight the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
  • The introduction of Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand should provide the background information, outline the research problem, and state the objectives and significance of the study.
  • Review existing research related to Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand, identifying gaps the study aims to fill.
  • The methodology section of Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand should describe the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques used.
  • Present the findings of the Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand research study using tables, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points.
  • Interpret Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand results, discussing their implications, limitations, and potential areas for future research.
  • Summarize the main findings of the Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand study and restate its significance.
  • List all the sources you cited in Comparative Study Of Public And Private Schools Students Performance In Shorthand project, following a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).