This research work is a comparison of leadership effectiveness between public and private enterprises based on some elected organization. Investigations shows that the success and failure of these organization mainly depends on how effective its leadership is, these research also points out the problem faced by these organizations and solution to it. In order to carry out an objective study questionnaire and interviews and personal observation were employed in the research, while table and percentages were used for the analysis. The view and work of work of other authors on this subtect matter was included in the form of second data the researcher found out that some of these problems faced by public enterprise which hampers leadership effectiveness are: communication gap between management and employees. Indifference to staff yearing, lack of material and less regard to land mark in private enterprises, the owner sees their business as profit oriented and therefore public enterprises are full of bottleneck bureaucrative personality and political influence which are not seen in private enterprises. Based on the findings, the ways to ensure effective leadership performamnce there should be avoidance of break down in communication gap between leader and subordinate there should be proper orientation and proper definition of roles and function, instructing leadership to qualified hands given free hand in the planning of both private and public enterprises.
Title page
Approval page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table of content
Chapter one
Introduction
Background of study
Statement of study
Purpose of study
Significant of the study
Scope of the study
Limitation of the study
Definitions of terms.
Chapter two
Literature review
Development of leadership for administrative purpose
The concept of leadership
Theories of leadership
Trait theory
Contingeny theory
Authoritarian style
Democratic or participative style
Louses fair style
Essence and qualities of a leader
Dedication
Ability to make effective decision
Ability to communicate effectively
Ability to practice the act of human relation
Ability to motivabte subordinate
Factors that affect the performance of a leader
Forces in the leader
Forces in the subordinate
Forces in the situation
Results of peer leadership
Tardiness and absentecism
Suggestion and Grievance report
Strike and possible closure
Chapter three
Research design and methodology
Introduction
Resear ch design
Sources/method of data collection
Population and sample size
Sample technique
Validity and reliability of measuring instrument
Method of data analysis
Chapter four
4.0 presentation and analysis of data
Introduction
Presentation of data
Analysis of data
Interpretation
Chapter five
5.0 summary, conclusion and recommendation
Introduction
Summary of finding
Conclusions recommendations
References
Appendix
Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises. (n.d.). UniTopics. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-study-of-leadership-effectiveness-between-public-and-private-enterprises/
“Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises.” UniTopics, https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-study-of-leadership-effectiveness-between-public-and-private-enterprises/. Accessed 22 November 2024.
“Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises.” UniTopics, Accessed November 22, 2024. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-study-of-leadership-effectiveness-between-public-and-private-enterprises/
Here’s a typical structure for Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises research projects:
- The title page of Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises should include the project title, your name, institution, and date.
- The abstract of Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises should be a summary of around 150-250 words and should highlight the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
- The introduction of Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises should provide the background information, outline the research problem, and state the objectives and significance of the study.
- Review existing research related to Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises, identifying gaps the study aims to fill.
- The methodology section of Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises should describe the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques used.
- Present the findings of the Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises research study using tables, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points.
- Interpret Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises results, discussing their implications, limitations, and potential areas for future research.
- Summarize the main findings of the Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises study and restate its significance.
- List all the sources you cited in Comparative Study Of Leadership Effectiveness Between Public And Private Enterprises project, following a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).