The comparison Evaluation of a heat transfer coefficient between the counter current and co-current flow arrangement was carried out on heat trainer, fabricated in Nigeria. The experiments carried out are of two different arrangement; counter-current flow arrangement and co-current flow arrangement of which counter-current flow firstly consist of counter-current flow with cold phase variation, hot phase constancy. Counter – current flow with hot phase variation and cold phase constancy. Secondly the arrangement is co-current flow arrangement which also consist of two different conditions, which are co-current flow with cold phase variation and hot phase constancy; co-current flow with hot phase variation and cold phase constancy. The equipment involves also liking reading of temperature at different flow rate, having completed the experiment and getting result a critical analysis and evaluation was carried out to get the best arrangement of the experiment. Using the graph plotted i.e. a graph of heat transfer rate per unit area against the log mean temperature difference, A result
showing the heat transfer coefficient was observed, This helped to get a conclusion of recommended flow arrangement.
Title page
Certification
Approval
Dedication
Acknowledgements
Abstract
Table of contents CHAPTER ONE:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Mechanism of Heat
1.3 Process Heat Transfer
1.4 Heat Transfer Process Equipment
1.4.1 Types of Heat Exchanger
1.4.2 Relative Direction of fluid motion
1.4.3 Design and Constructional features
1.5 heat Transfer Coefficient
1.6 Thermal Conductivity
1.7 Problem Statement
1.8 Objectives of the study
1.9 Significance of study
1.10 Scope of study
1.11 Limitation of study
1.12 Challenges of the study
References
CHAPTER TWO:
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Heat Transfer Introduction
2.2 Mean Temperature differences
2.3 Assumptions and Limitations
2.4` practical Heat transfer information
2.5 Enthalpy
References
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.2 Equipment Set up
3.3 Procedure
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.2 Data Treatment
CHAPTER FIVE:
5.0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Discussion of Findings
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendations
Bibliography
Notation
Appendix A
Appendix B
Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger. (n.d.). UniTopics. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-enthalpy-approach-for-co-and-counter-current-flow-in-concentric-tube-heat-exchanger/
“Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger.” UniTopics, https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-enthalpy-approach-for-co-and-counter-current-flow-in-concentric-tube-heat-exchanger/. Accessed 25 November 2024.
“Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger.” UniTopics, Accessed November 25, 2024. https://www.unitopics.com/project/material/comparative-enthalpy-approach-for-co-and-counter-current-flow-in-concentric-tube-heat-exchanger/
Here’s a typical structure for Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger research projects:
- The title page of Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger should include the project title, your name, institution, and date.
- The abstract of Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger should be a summary of around 150-250 words and should highlight the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
- The introduction of Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger should provide the background information, outline the research problem, and state the objectives and significance of the study.
- Review existing research related to Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger, identifying gaps the study aims to fill.
- The methodology section of Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger should describe the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques used.
- Present the findings of the Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger research study using tables, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points.
- Interpret Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger results, discussing their implications, limitations, and potential areas for future research.
- Summarize the main findings of the Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger study and restate its significance.
- List all the sources you cited in Comparative Enthalpy Approach For Co- And Counter Current Flow In Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger project, following a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).